What the study found
The study reviewed telemedicine approaches across ten countries and compared them with Malaysia. It reports that suitable approaches and technologies were discussed based on the analysis.
Why the authors say this matters
The authors say that if no suitable approach is found, it may be possible to identify the most relevant approach and best practice and to learn from possible weaknesses.
What the researchers tested
The researchers reviewed literature on telemedicine development approaches in China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Canada, the U.K, Australia, and New Zealand. They compared and contrasted these approaches with Malaysia's.
What worked and what didn't
The abstract does not give specific results for each country or say which approaches worked best. It states only that the analysis led to discussion of suitable approaches and technologies, and that relevant approaches and best practices could be elicited if no suitable approach is found.
What to keep in mind
The available summary does not describe detailed findings, evaluation criteria, or limitations. It also does not specify the exact telemedicine approaches or technologies discussed.
Key points
- The paper compares telemedicine approaches in ten countries with Malaysia.
- The countries named are China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Canada, the U.K, Australia, and New Zealand.
- The authors say suitable approaches and technologies were discussed from the analysis.
- The abstract suggests that best practices and weaknesses may be identified if no suitable approach is found.
Disclosure
- Research title:
- Telemedicine approaches were compared across ten countries
- Image credit:
- Photo by www.kaboompics.com on Pexels
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.