Focal Interest
Focal Interest
AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: STRONG — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

States securitize diasporas across borders

An airport or government building interior showing multiple people of diverse backgrounds standing in queues near blue metal barriers and a red illuminated security device, with institutional flooring and columns visible.
Research area:Social SciencesSociology and Political ScienceDiaspora, migration, transnational identity

What the study found

The study argues that diasporas are often constructed as security threats by both countries of residence and countries of origin, especially when they come from conflict areas. It also says that, despite a recent trend that celebrates diasporas as agents of peace, securitization of diasporas remains prevalent across borders.

What the authors say this matters
The authors conclude that these policies serve a vital function for both host and home countries by affirming internal accountability and securing national unity against external threats to the state. The study suggests that both welcoming and restrictive views of diasporas still support the protection of the nation-state.

What the researchers tested

The article explores how diasporas are constructed as security threats by various actors. It focuses on diasporas' transnational ties, including ties to homelands and other networks, and considers concerns raised in both residence countries and countries of origin.

What worked and what didn't

The abstract says diasporas are seen as non-state actors with non-transparent transnational ties, possible dual loyalties, and a risk of carrying homeland conflicts into public unrest and security issues. It also notes that home states may view diasporas as conflict perpetuators, regime destabilizers, or dissidents that need to be controlled. At the same time, the abstract acknowledges a recent trend that celebrates diasporas as agents of peace.

What to keep in mind

The available summary does not describe a specific dataset, case selection, or method in detail. It also does not provide limitations beyond the broad focus on diasporas, especially those from conflict areas.

Key points

  • Diasporas are described as being constructed as security threats by both host and home states.
  • The abstract says this securitization remains prevalent across borders.
  • Diasporas from conflict areas are highlighted as especially subject to suspicion.
  • Home states may see diasporas as conflict perpetuators, regime destabilizers, or dissidents.
  • The authors say these policies help affirm internal accountability and national unity.

Disclosure

Research title:
States securitize diasporas across borders
Publication date:
2026-02-13
DOI:
10.1080/01419870.2026.2624631
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: AI provenance information is not available for this post.

More posts