AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: STRONG — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

Children’s token taking depends on relative status

An adult and child sit at a wooden table playing chess indoors in a bright room with yellow and blue wall sections, the child reaching toward the board while the adult watches.
Research area:Developmental psychologySocial statusPeer influence

What the study found

Children’s token taking was shaped by relative status in social settings, and gender differences appeared only when status was equal.

Why the authors say this matters

The findings indicate that children’s taking is calibrated to socially instantiated relative status rather than to performance alone, and the authors conclude that the study reveals early status sensitivity and helps specify when gender differences in taking emerge.

What the researchers tested

In two preregistered studies, children aged 4 to 8 completed a competitive "Where's Waldo?" task and then chose how many tokens to take from a new peer. In Study 1, children competed against a pre-recorded peer and were randomly assigned to win or lose, then chose between an unfamiliar prior winner or loser as the token source. In Study 2, children played against the clock without a peer competitor and were randomly assigned to succeed or fail.

What worked and what didn't

In Study 1, children with low relative status (losers taking from winners) took more than half the tokens, while high-status children (winners taking from losers) did not differ from an equal split. Under equal status, boys took more than half, whereas girls did not differ from an equal split. In Study 2, children took more than half of their peers' tokens in the non-social context.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not describe limitations beyond the study designs and the fact that the results come from two preregistered studies with children aged 4 to 8. The comparison is based on the situations described in the abstract, so no broader claims beyond those contexts are provided.

Key points

  • Children’s token taking varied with socially defined relative status.
  • Low-status children took more than half of the tokens from a peer.
  • High-status children did not differ from an equal split.
  • Under equal status, boys took more than half while girls did not.
  • In a non-social success/fail task, children took more than half of peers’ tokens.

Disclosure

Research title:
Children’s token taking depends on relative status
Authors:
Chana Berelejis, Oded Ritov, Jan Engelmann, Avi Benozio
Institutions:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem, University of California, Berkeley
Publication date:
2026-02-27
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: This post was generated by OpenAI. The original authors did not write or review this post.