AI Summary of Scholarly Research
This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. See full disclosure ↓
Publication Signals show what we were able to verify about where this research was published.MODERATECore publication signals for this source were verified. Publication Signals reflect the source’s verifiable credentials, not the quality of the research.
- ✔ Published in indexed journal
- ✔ No retraction or integrity flags
Key findings from this study
This research indicates that:
- Remaining-Time feedback increases frustration compared to Elapsed-Time feedback during system delays.
- No Time Display makes waits feel longer and heightens ambiguity about delay resolution.
- Temporal feedback mode does not influence post-wait task performance despite affecting wait-time perception.
Overview
System-imposed delays disrupt digital workflows and user experience. This experiment examined how temporal feedback modes influence both wait-time perception and subsequent task performance. The study tested three feedback conditions (Remaining-Time, Elapsed-Time, No Time Display) across three delay durations (10, 30, 60 seconds) with 425 participants performing a visual reasoning task.
Methods and approach
The online experiment manipulated two independent variables: temporal feedback mode and delay duration. Participants completed a visual reasoning task, experienced a system-imposed wait period, then performed a downstream task. The study measured perceived wait duration, frustration levels, ambiguity, and post-wait task performance across conditions.
Results
Temporal feedback mode significantly shaped wait-time perception and affective experience. Remaining-Time feedback increased frustration relative to Elapsed-Time feedback. No Time Display made waits feel subjectively longer and heightened perceived ambiguity about delay resolution.
Despite these experiential differences across feedback conditions, post-wait task performance did not differ significantly between groups. Participants maintained equivalent downstream task performance regardless of temporal feedback mode or which delay duration they experienced. This dissociation suggests that affective and cognitive responses to waiting operate independently from subsequent task execution.
Implications
The findings indicate that temporal feedback design shapes user experience during system delays, with implications for interface design in latency-prone systems. Remaining-Time displays may increase cognitive engagement but at a cost to emotional experience. Organizations implementing temporal feedback must weigh experiential benefits against the lack of performance benefits to justify design choices.
The independence between wait-time experience and downstream task performance suggests that optimizing user experience during delays requires targeting affective and perceptual factors directly, rather than expecting experiential improvements to automatically enhance subsequent work. Psychophysical principles governing time perception provide actionable design guidance for reducing frustration and ambiguity in systems with inherent latency constraints.
Scope and limitations
This summary is based on the study abstract and available metadata. It does not include a full analysis of the complete paper, supplementary materials, or underlying datasets unless explicitly stated. Findings should be interpreted in the context of the original publication.
Disclosure
- Research title: Counting the Wait: Effects of Temporal Feedback on Downstream Task Performance and Perceived Wait-Time Experience during System-Imposed Delays
- Authors: Felicia Fang-Yi Tan, Oded Nov
- Institutions: New York University
- Publication date: 2026-04-13
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790475
- OpenAlex record: View
- Image credit: Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash (Source • License)
- Disclosure: This post was generated by Claude (Anthropic). The original authors did not write or review this post.


