AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: STRONG — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

Animal encounters are linked to stronger nature connection

A child in a cap stands in a grassy meadow surrounded by geese and ducks, observing the birds in a natural outdoor setting with coniferous forest trees in the background.
Research area:PsychologySocial Psychology

What the study found

The meta-analysis found a modest but statistically significant positive association between animal encounters and connection to nature. The authors report that the overall effect was small, with low heterogeneity and negligible publication bias.

Why the authors say this matters

The authors conclude that these findings suggest animals may play a role in strengthening connection to nature, which the abstract describes as relevant to pro-environmental behavior and individual well-being. They also state that the findings support using animal contact in conservation engagement efforts.

What the researchers tested

The researchers followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and searched ProQuest, Web of Science, ERIC, and PubMed for empirical, peer-reviewed studies published from 2000 to 2024. They included 116 studies in the systematic review and 15 studies, yielding 23 independent samples, in the meta-analysis.

What worked and what didn't

The analysis indicated a small positive effect of animal encounters on connection to nature (d = 0.18, 95% CI [0.10, 0.26]). Mammals and birds were the most frequently studied animals, while amphibians, reptiles, and fish were underrepresented. The abstract also notes that most studies had sample sizes below 1000 participants.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not describe detailed limitations beyond the underrepresentation of some animal groups and the fact that most studies were relatively small. The findings are based on studies from 2000 to 2024, with most reviewed studies conducted in North America, Europe, and Australia.

Key points

  • Animal encounters showed a small but statistically significant positive association with connection to nature.
  • The meta-analysis reported low heterogeneity and negligible publication bias.
  • A total of 116 studies were included in the systematic review, and 15 studies contributed to the meta-analysis.
  • Mammals and birds were studied most often; amphibians, reptiles, and fish were underrepresented.
  • Most included studies had fewer than 1000 participants.

Disclosure

Research title:
Animal encounters are linked to stronger nature connection
Authors:
Matthias Winfried Kleespies, Paul Wilhelm Dierkes
Institutions:
Goethe University Frankfurt
Publication date:
2026-03-11
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: This post was generated by OpenAI. The original authors did not write or review this post.